|
The
EPA Office of
Pesticide Programs has imposed specific data requirements for endangered
species information. The Agency has done so in a variety of ways:
express conditions on registrations and applicants under FIFRA, data
call-ins as part of the reregistration process, and other communications
with registrants and applicants. See also,
PR Notice 2000-2. The Agency has made clear in recent months,
including through the preamble of the proposed final rule revising 40CFR
Part 158 data requirements and individual requests to specific
registrants, that endangered species requirements are becoming
commonplace. FESTF data are now a key source of compliance with these
requirements.
FESTF has largely completed its work and has submitted to EPA its data,
including its innovative information management system (IMS), which is
now being used by FESTF members and EPA for endangered species
assessments. As such, the Task Force has moved into a phase of
independently assessing the registrations and data requirements of
non-members. FESTF is implementing an active program of enforcing the
data compensation rights granted to it and its members under FIFRA.
Under the circumstances, and in the interest of resolving potential data
compensation disputes and avoiding potential litigation, FESTF has
developed three options for a non-member to resolve data compensation
obligations to the Task Force. The methods are (1) full membership; (2)
access to the IMS (and supporting data) through use (at the non-member's
expense) of consultants trained and approved by FESTF; and (3) data
citation only.
If
your company is interested in reaching an agreement with FESTF on one of
these three bases, the next step would be for FESTF to arrange a meeting
or other suitable conference involving appropriate individuals from your
company with authority to enter into a legally-binding data compensation
agreement. We intend to move expeditiously in such negotiations. If
you wish to explore this with FESTF,
contact us. |